Ukendt NL100 donk (shortie), som jeg ikke har noter eller lignende på.
Seat 1: rudolfsen ($99.50 in chips)
Seat 2: NilPferD ($106.25 in chips)
Seat 4: pompeyboy ($130.36 in chips)
Seat 5: mancini ($192.25 in chips)
Seat 6: Gust021 ($52.75 in chips)
mancini: posts small blind $0.50
Gust021: posts big blind $1
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to mancini [A ♦ T ♣
rudolfsen: folds
NilPferD: folds
pompeyboy: folds
mancini: raises to $4
Gust021: calls $3
----- FLOP ----- [A ♥ 9 ♦ 8 ♣ (8)
mancini: bets $6
jagAEGER joins the table at seat #3
Gust021: calls $6
----- TURN ----- [A ♥ 9 ♦ 8 ♣ K ♥ (20)
mancini: checks
Gust021: bets $11
mancini: calls $11
----- RIVER ----- [A ♥ 9 ♦ 8 ♣ K ♥ 2 ♣ (42)
mancini: checks
Gust021: bets $31.75 and is all-in
mancini: calls $31.75
Godt eller skidt?
AT NL100 blind battle vs short
04-04-2007 17:19
#1|
0
04-04-2007 17:26
#2|
0
Helt fint, ingen draws der completer så den skal bare kaldes. Kan godt finde på at CR turn men det er alt efter gut feeling
04-04-2007 17:51
#3|
0
Det er fint at gå broke her efter min mening, turn skriger på et check raise. Men selvfølgelig, hvis du tror du kan få ham til at bluffe river, så er det fint bare at calle turn.
Du skal være logget ind for at kunne skrive et svar!