Bøger...

Hej allesammen...

Her på torsdag i næste uge rejser jeg på ferie til Spanien.
Jeg er derfor interesseret i noget læsestof og tænkte på at købe nogle pokerbøger. Så jeg vil høre om nogle af jer har nogle gamle bøger liggende, som i er interesseret i at sælge...
Jeg er interesseret i stort set alt,
så bare skriv hvad i har.

Mvh
Tobias

meget apropos så har jeg nogle artikler liggende af Alan Schoonmaker om at rykke op i limit......dem kunne du passende printe ud og tage med til Spanien

@ AngkorWat (skal holde tungen lige i munden når man skriver det :-)

Kan du ikke linke til de artikler, eller evt sende dem rjep00(snabela)samnet.sdu.dk

på forhånd tak

Hej Saibot,

Jeg har følgende 2 bøger liggende, alle er helt nye og koster 250/stk +porto eller begge for 500 portofrit

The Theory Of Poker ( David Sklansky)

Championship Satellite Strategy (Tom McEvoy + Brad Daugherty)

Interessede kan maile mig på [email protected]

Mvh

wsop.dk

jeg har ikke noget link til artiklerne, men jeg kan lige copy/paste dem ind her til dem der har interesse i det.....engang ved lejlighed, jeg skal lige have fat i min computer

Hej WSOP

Jeg kunne godt tænke mig at købe Championship Satellite Strategy. Dog synes jeg din pris da den ligger på nettet til 150 kr.

www.wedoitallvegas.com/books/Championship_Satellite_Strategy_Poker_Book.asp?kbid=1021

Skal vi sige 200 kr?
Jeg har mulighed for at overføre med det samme, hvis det er

Tobias

Vil også gerne læse den artikel angkorwat, så glæder mig til du får den lagt op

Vil også gerne læse den artikel angkorwat, så glæder mig til du får den lagt op

Hej Saibot,

Det lyder fair, send mig en mail [email protected]

Så er der artikler til alle, selvom det måske bliver det længste indlæg nogensinde - overhovedet!


"ALL 3 COL
MOVING UP
POKER DIGEST
POKER ARTICLES
SHOULD YOU MOVE UP?
I. YOUR MOTIVES
By
Alan N. Schoonmaker, Ph.D.

Sooner or later, most winners ask that question. We wonder whether we will have more fun and make more money in bigger games. The answer, like the ones to so many poker questions, is: “It depends.” The right answer for you may not be the right one for me.
Moving up violates the “select soft games” principle of previous columns because larger games are usually tougher. You should violate that principle only for very good reasons, and many people move up for the wrong ones.
Although the games get tougher, moving up for the right reasons does not violate the selective aggression principle; you should move up only if the benefits exceed the risks and costs. Base your decision on: (1) your motives, (2) your abilities, and (3) your bankroll. Unless they are all favorable, don’t move. Unfortunately, many people deceive themselves about all three. This column will focus on your motives. Future columns will discuss your abilities and bankroll, then suggest a strategy for making your move.
Motivation comes first because you should always analyze why you want to do something. Many people don’t analyze; they just yield to their impulses, then wonder why things go wrong so often.
TYPES OF MOTIVES
There are five primary reasons for moving up: (1) stimulation, (2) profit, (3) status, (4) testing yourself, and (5) developing your game.
Stimulation
As games get bigger, the money becomes more interesting, and the players get better and more exciting. If you are bored with your current limits for the right reasons (e.g., because it is too easy to win), perhaps you should move up. If you are bored for the wrong reasons (e.g., because you have crave more action, even though you lose), you should stay where you are — or even move down.
Of course, you may enjoy your current game, but still want more kick. You can beat most small games by just being tight and aggressive. Since larger games are tighter and more aggressive, you can’t win on style alone; you have to be deceptive, imaginative, and analytic, which makes the games much more stimulating.
Profit
If you can win the same number of bets per hour, your profits will obviously increase, but you probably can’t do it. Because the games get tougher, you could easily shift from a winner to a break-even or losing player.
You should also decide what the added profit means to you. If poker is your primary or secondary job, profit is economically important. If you are a winning recreational player, and the gains and losses are just the way to keep score, you may be wiser to stay put. You’re getting the pleasure of winning regularly, and you may feel frustrated if you win more money, but fewer big bets per hour (BBPH). For example, you may feel much better winning $9 per hour playing $3-$6 (1.5 BBPH) than winning $10 per hour in a $10-20 game (0.5 BBPH).
Lots of people don’t need the money, but need to feel they are winning enough to satisfy an ego drive (even if they don’t see it that way). For example, one member of our poker discussion group (PDG) wants to move from the smaller games she beats to $15-$30 at which she has lost consistently. She wrote: “the theoretical win per hour in the larger game is attractive to me, because I don"t want to work for 8 or 10 or 16 bucks an hour. My time is ... simply more valuable than that, and I can make tremendously more by trading or consulting, etc.”
Since she can make “tremendously more” by working, profit’s importance is clearly psychological, not economic. If the money was economically important, she should obviously work instead of play poker. H

Nice read
Bliver dog nede et par måneder endnu og old Billy skal eddermanme blankes :P

Saibot har endnu ikke hørt fra dig ?

Var du interesseret i den bog til 200, så send mig en mail.

Har sendt en mail nu...

ok