NL50 - 99 vs 3bet+call

Hey Chefer,

Villian 1
26/18
4bet range: 1,7%
Hands: 1000

Villian 2
SQZ og 3better en del, er meget aggressiv
3bet: 10%
sqz: 13%
AF: 11
hands: 300


Hvad synes i om følgende play:

***** Hand History for Game 2647128897 ***** (Boss)
$50.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, July 20, 05:37:28 ET 2011
Table Table 50BB TH 456 (Real Money)
Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ( $67.00 USD )
Seat 2: Villian 2 ( $50.85 USD )
Seat 3: anglerman ( $66.90 USD )
Seat 5: Villian 1 ( $83.40 USD )
anglerman posts big blind [$0.50 USD].
Villian 2 posts small blind [$0.25 USD].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ 9♥ 9♦ ]
Villian 1 raises [$1.43 USD]
Hero calls [$1.43 USD]
Villian 2 raises [$6.61 USD]
anglerman folds
Villian 1 calls [$5.43 USD]
Hero raises [$65.57 USD]
Villian 2 folds
Villian 1 folds
Hero wins $21.08 USD from main pot
Hero wins $60.14 USD

Mine tanker er at Villian 1 aldrig kan være særlig stærk når han bare kalder villian 2's 3bet.. Villian 2 er aldrig særlig stærk med hans 3bet + sqz og folder ofte, hvad siger pn?

Synes det virker ret std i det spot mod de givne villains. Wp imo

Fjern dog resultatet en anden gang.

Jep agree, standard.