PokeStars ændrer short borde til cap borde på PLO100

#1| 0

Ja suk

PokerStars har ændret at man nu ikke kan side med 50$ på et plo 100 bord short bord men max 20$


WTF sker der serisøt for det. Det kommer til at dræne hu spillene på de limits tror jeg.
Skandale, måtte bare lige ud med det.


Plo 100 short med max 20 bb dyb amen lol spillet er død

07-03-2013 16:02 #2| 0
OP

amen suk, hvilken skandale

07-03-2013 16:16 #3| 6

så spil plo50 med fuldt buyin?

07-03-2013 16:56 #4| 0

freak, tror han er sur over han ikke kan få lov at nitte den imod fiskene der gerne vil flippe.

positivt at stars prøver at beskytte fiskenes interesser.

07-03-2013 18:40 #5| 0

RATHOLING

Ratholing has been the number one issue at our NL/PL ring games for several years. We do already have effective limits that prevent players from leaving a table and then returning to the same table with fewer chips within 2 hours. In this email, however, ‘ratholing’ will refer to leaving a table and then buying into a *similar* table with fewer chips.

An individual instance of ratholing, taken in isolation, is not a problem for our poker room. Players may change tables for a variety of reasons. Perhaps they are playing with their whole bankroll, have won a large pot, and would like to split their stack to play two tables. Perhaps a player they do not like playing against has just sat down. When sitting at a new table, perhaps they like to start with a smaller stack to risk less against unknown opponents. Whatever the reason, we do not want to restrict such activity within our Poker Room.

On the other hand, systematic ratholing as a predominant strategy is a problem. This strategy is well known and practiced by many multi-tabling regulars, some of whom learned the strategy from poker education websites or poker forum discussions. It’s hard to play for very long at our ring game tables without noticing at least that many players leave after winning pots, though perhaps not everyone understands why.
The constant leaving and joining of tables adds up to having a negative impact on the playing experience of opponents. Regular ring game tables are meant to offer more stable line-ups of opponents, as opposed to Zoom where opponents change more regularly. The constant resetting of stacks to 40bb keeps effective stacks pegged at the low end of the 40-100bb buy-in range at our standard tables, sometimes to the extreme of turning tables into effectively 40bb CAP tables, contrary to the intention and labelling. Recreational players would prefer to be able to have the opportunity to win their money back after losing a pot, but instead they see it leave the table immediately, time after time.

We are going to take action to limit ratholing activity at our ring games. Our current plan is to address this issue during the first half of the year and it is a top priority to act within this timeframe. I do not anticipate delay.

It is a great challenge to define a solution that allows acceptable limited instances of ratholing but stops systematic ratholing. A seemingly simple problem becomes more complex when details like table type and buy-in are considered. We have spent quite a lot of time considering ideas that have been put forth by our players and staff. The more intuitive and simple solutions that have been suggested have all been found to have fatal flaws due to complexity, loopholes that would render them ineffective, or overzealous mechanisms that would inappropriately restrict recreational players.

Because we are determined to take action in this area, we are considering a solution that is not quite as simple or easily communicated as we would like. This solution, based on a brief suggestion from a player, is still being developed. When it is ready, we will share it with players for feedback. Assuming there are no serious issues encountered, we hope to finalize the details within a month in order to meet our timeline for deployment by June 30th.

Redigeret af Perbaad d. 07-03-2013 18:40
07-03-2013 18:59 #6| 0
OP

Sikke en omgang vrøvl Live :/


08-03-2013 17:58 #7| 2
forumserver.twoplustwo.com/58/heads-up-nl/feedback-requested-potential-changes-pokerstars-heads-up-offerings-1300435/index22.html

Haha, Stars laver en tråd på 2+2 for at høre hvad folk synes om at ændre 50BB borde til CAP borde. Alle synes det er en lorte idé, Stars gør det alligevel, og 2+2 vælger at lukke tråden og banne PokerStars manden, da han obv ikke lytter til folk alligevel.
08-03-2013 18:58 #8| 0
Dieb skrev:
forumserver.twoplustwo.com/58/heads-up-nl/feedback-requested-potential-changes-pokerstars-heads-up-offerings-1300435/index22.html

Haha, Stars laver en tråd på 2+2 for at høre hvad folk synes om at ændre 50BB borde til CAP borde. Alle synes det er en lorte idé, Stars gør det alligevel, og 2+2 vælger at lukke tråden og banne PokerStars manden, da han obv ikke lytter til folk alligevel.


Awesome :D
08-03-2013 20:17 #9| 0
Dieb skrev:
forumserver.twoplustwo.com/58/heads-up-nl/feedback-requested-potential-changes-pokerstars-heads-up-offerings-1300435/index22.html

Haha, Stars laver en tråd på 2+2 for at høre hvad folk synes om at ændre 50BB borde til CAP borde. Alle synes det er en lorte idé, Stars gør det alligevel, og 2+2 vælger at lukke tråden og banne PokerStars manden, da han obv ikke lytter til folk alligevel.


Det er sick hvordan Stars bare pisse brugerne, specielt napsus og de andre som har lagt meget arbejde i det, op og ned af rykken. Håber det bliver ris til egen røv!
← Gå til forumoversigtenGå til toppen ↑
Skriv et svar